Metal cutting tools for milling, drilling, turning and threading EN/IT/CZ/PL/UA
Get a tool recommendation

MILLING

Solid carbide end millsIndexable milling cutters

DRILLING AND HOLES

Solid carbide drillsIndexable drillsCarbide reamers

TURNING

Turning toolholdersTurning insertsGrooving and parting

THREADING AND SWISS-TYPE

Threading toolholders and insertsTooling for Swiss-type lathes

Technical information

Cutting edge damageTurning: troubleshootingMilling: troubleshootingDrilling: troubleshootingThreading: infeed methods and passes

About the brand

About the brandQuality and inspection

More

Downloads Contacts Get a tool recommendation
Home/Technical information/Cutting edge damage

Technical information

Cutting edge damage

Ten states of the cutting edge you will meet in any operation. The anchor page of the technical section: it explains how to tell one type of damage from another.

10types of damage
4groups of causes
2of them are normal wear
3operations it applies to

Half the mistakes on the shop floor start with the wrong identification. Chipping and plastic deformation look similar at arm's length, but the cures are opposite: the first needs a tougher grade, the second a lower speed and better heat resistance. So the first step is always the same: look at the edge under magnification.

Normal wear 2 types

This is not a fault. The edge always wears; the only question is whether it happens predictably and whether you get the insert changed before the wear turns into failure.

Macro shot of a cutting edge: even flank wear near the nose of the insert
Nose wear

Flank wear at the nose

What it looks like

An even bright band along the edge on the flank side. It grows gradually and uniformly.

What it leads to

Surface finish deteriorates and the part size slowly drifts in one direction.

Why it happens
  • Cutting speed too high.
  • The tool life of the insert is used up — that is, everything is going as it should, it is simply time to change it.
What to do
  1. Reduce Vc.
  2. Move to a grade with higher wear resistance.
  3. Tie the change to a part count rather than to the end of the shift.
Macro shot of an insert: crater wear on the rake face, washed out by the chip at a distance from the edge
Crater wear

Crater wear on the rake face

What it looks like

A hollow on the rake face a little back from the edge — where the chip slides. Visible only from above, at an angle.

What it leads to

Chip evacuation and part surface both get worse. When the crater reaches the edge, the edge thins out and breaks without warning.

Why it happens

Cutting speed too high: the temperature where the chip contacts the rake face.

What to do
  1. Reduce Vc.
  2. Move to a grade for high-speed machining — cermet, or a grade with an Al₂O₃-based coating.
What not to do. Do not judge the state of the edge from the side alone: an edge that “looks intact” may be undercut by a crater from below.

Load-driven failure 3 types

Macro shot of an edge with fine chipping along the whole length of the cutting edge
Chipping

Chipping

What it looks like

Small breakouts along the edge, a ragged line instead of a straight one.

What it leads to

Cutting forces rise and surface finish suffers.

Why it happens
  • Feed too high.
  • Vibration.
  • The setup is not rigid.
What to do
  1. Reduce f and ap.
  2. Move to a more rigid toolholder, shorten the overhang.
  3. Move to a stronger grade.
Macro shot of an insert with a large mechanical fracture of the cutting edge
Mechanical fracture

Mechanical fracture

What it looks like

Not small breakouts but a large fracture or a crack across the edge. It happens suddenly.

What it leads to

Tool life becomes unpredictable: one insert lasts the full run, the next one fails on the first part.

Why it happens
  • Feed and depth of cut too high.
  • Vibration.
What to do
  1. Move to a stronger grade.
  2. Increase the edge chamfer and the nose radius.
  3. Move to a more rigid toolholder.
What not to do. Do not index the insert to the next edge if there is a crack in the body: it will fail under load rather than gradually.
Macro shot of an edge with notch wear at the depth-of-cut line
Notching

Notching

What it looks like

The edge becomes serrated, with small teeth along it.

What it leads to

A burr forms on the part and cutting forces rise.

Why it happens

Feed and cutting speed both too high at the same time.

What to do
  1. Move to a sharper edge.
  2. Reduce Vc.
  3. Move to a grade with better heat resistance.

Heat-driven failure 3 types

Macro shot of an insert nose that has sagged from plastic deformation under heat
Plastic deformation

Plastic deformation

What it looks like

The nose is neither fractured nor worn but has “flowed” — sagged and spread. Often together with cracks on the nose itself.

What it leads to

Part size drifts, and after that the edge fails catastrophically.

Why it happens
  • Very high load in the cut.
  • The wrong tool grade.
What to do
  1. Reduce f and ap.
  2. Move to a stronger grade with better heat resistance.
What not to do. Do not confuse this with chipping: here the edge is intact, and a stronger grade without a change of cutting data will not help.
Macro shot of an edge with a comb of thermal cracks perpendicular to the cutting edge
Thermal cracks

Cracking from thermal load and thermal shock

What it looks like

A row of parallel cracks across the edge, like a comb, at roughly equal spacing.

What it leads to

Fragments break out between the cracks and the edge crumbles away.

Why it happens

Temperature swings rather than temperature as such: interrupted cuts, milling, intermittent coolant supply. Excessive Vc and f make it worse.

What to do
  1. Reduce f, then Vc.
  2. Move to cutting dry — or provide copious, uninterrupted coolant. There is no middle option here.
Macro shot of an insert: a crack running from a worn section of the cutting edge
Crack from wear

Cracking caused by wear

What it looks like

Cracks appear on an edge that is already heavily worn — as a continuation of the wear band, not on their own.

What it leads to

The machined surface deteriorates sharply and the part size jumps.

Why it happens

Cutting speed too high, plus running the insert beyond its tool life.

What to do
  1. Shorten the accepted tool life on roughing passes.
  2. Move to a grade with higher wear resistance.

Adhesion and coating 2 types

Macro shot of an edge with a built-up edge of welded workpiece material
Built-up edge

Cracking from welding or built-up edge

What it looks like

Workpiece material stuck to the edge; where the built-up edge tore away, pulled-out patches are left behind.

What it leads to

The surface suffers, cutting forces rise and the size jumps from part to part.

Why it happens

Cutting speed too low on a material prone to adhesion.

What to do
  1. Raise Vc.
  2. Move to a more precise edge geometry: a larger rake angle, a smaller chamfer, a polished rake face.
What not to do. Do not reduce the speed “to make it gentler” — it will get worse.
Macro shot of an insert with an area of flaked wear-resistant coating
Flaking

Coating flaking

What it looks like

The coating comes away in patches, exposing the substrate; the edge looks blotchy.

What it leads to

The exposed substrate wears much faster, and edge failure follows.

Why it happens
  • The insert is not strong enough for these conditions.
  • The toolholder is not rigid enough.
  • Machining high-hardness materials, or running with vibration.
What to do
  1. Move to a stronger grade — in tough conditions that may be CBN with a TiC coating.
  2. Move to a more rigid toolholder, get rid of the vibration.
  3. Change the edge preparation: different honing or chamfer.

Summary table

Type of damageWhat it leads toCausesActions
Flank wear at the noseSurface finish, dimensional accuracyVc too high; tool life used upReduce Vc; grade with higher wear resistance
NotchingBurr on the part, rising cutting forcesf and Vc too highSharper edge; reduce Vc; grade with better heat resistance
Crater wearPoorer chip evacuation, poorer surfaceVc too highReduce Vc; grade for high-speed machining (cermet, coated Al₂O₃)
Plastic deformationChange in part size, cracks on the noseVery high load; wrong gradeStronger grade; reduce f and ap
Cracking caused by wearSharp deterioration of surface, jump in sizeVc too highShorten tool life on roughing passes; grade with higher wear resistance
ChippingRising cutting forces, poorer finishf too high; vibration; non-rigid setupReduce f and ap; more rigid toolholder; stronger grade
Cracking from built-up edgePoorer surface, rising cutting forcesVc too lowIncrease Vc; more precise edge geometry (rake angle, chamfer)
Mechanical fractureCracks, unpredictable tool lifef and ap too high; vibrationStronger grade; increase chamfer and rε; more rigid toolholder
Thermal cracks, thermal shockA comb of cracks, chipping between themVc and f too high; interrupted cuts and millingReduce f and Vc; move to cutting dry
Coating flakingSharply accelerated wear of the exposed substrateInsert not strong enough; toolholder not rigid enoughStronger grade (TiC on CBN); more rigid toolholder; different edge preparation

What a correct diagnosis gives you

Less trial and error

One look at the edge replaces three trial batches with different grades. The insert has already written down what happened to it.

Predictable changes

When wear is normal it can be measured and tied to a part count. An emergency change becomes a planned one.

One tool instead of three

Most “unusable” inserts actually work — just not in those conditions. A correct diagnosis keeps them in the programme.

Related sections