Technical information
Every tooth enters and leaves the material thousands of times in a single pass. The edge works under impact and in a constant thermal cycle — which is why fractures and thermal cracks appear here earlier, and even abrasive wear later.
The order is the same as in turning: cutting data first, then the geometry and condition of the cutter, then the grade, and finally rigidity and the machine. But two questions are added that do not arise in turning: how many teeth are in the cut at once, and where the cutter sits in relation to the workpiece. Very often that is what fixes the situation, not the grade.
Notation: Vc — cutting speed, fz — feed per tooth, ap — depth of cut, ae — width of cut.
An even wear band along the edge, the same on every insert in the cutter. Life before the change is clearly shorter than expected.
Breakouts along the edge or cracks across the insert. Often on one or two inserts in the set rather than all of them.
Parallel cracks across the edge, like a comb, with fragments then breaking out between them. In milling this is the most typical form of damage.
The edge heats up in the cut and cools outside it — thousands of times in a single pass. It happens most sharply when the coolant is supplied intermittently or the jet does not reach into the zone.
Workpiece material welded to the edge, a torn surface on the part, and small pulled-out patches where the built-up edge tore away.
Speed and feed too low on a ductile material: low-carbon steel, stainless, aluminium.
The nose has sagged, the edge is intact. Size and flatness drift, and catastrophic failure follows.
A temperature higher than the grade can hold: Vc, fz and ap too high in combination, particularly on high-hardness materials.
A dull or torn pattern instead of an even face, sometimes a regular wave — that is already vibration.
A visible step where passes meet, or regular ridges across the width of cut.
The inserts are running at different heights — through runout, a worn pocket, or inserts that actually differ in size. The second cause is the cutter deflecting under excessive cutting data.
Breakouts on the edge of the part where the tooth leaves the material. Typical of cast iron; on ductile materials you get a burr in the same place.
As the tooth exits, the material has nothing behind it. The greater the force on the tooth and the more abrupt the exit, the larger the breakout.
Once off the machine the part has a dish or an out-of-parallel error that was not there on the machine.
A hum or a rattle, a regular wave on the surface, fine breakouts on all the inserts at once.
Chips fly around the working area, get back under the teeth, scratch the finished surface and clog the slots of the fixture.
The chips have nowhere to go: too low a feed produces fine dust, a badly aimed coolant jet returns them into the zone, and the insert geometry does not form the chip.
● — act in this direction · ↑ — increase · ↓ — decrease. The order of the actions is given in the card for the case concerned.
| What happened | Choice of grade | Cutting data | Cutter geometry and condition | Setup | Machine | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hardness | strength | heat resistance | resistance to adhesion | Vc | fz | ap | cutter Ø / ae | toolpath | coolant | chipbreaker | clearance angle | corner angle | edge strength | no. of inserts | wiper edge | runout | arbor rigidity | workpiece clamping | overhang | |||
| Accelerated flank wear | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||||
| Chipping and cracks in the inserts | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
| Edge damage from thermal shock | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||||||
| Built-up edge on the cutting edge | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||||||||
| Plastic deformation of the nose | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||||||
| Poor surface finish | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||
| Steps and unevenness | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||
| Chipping of the part edges | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||
| Poor flatness and parallelism | ● | ● *5 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
| Heavy vibration | ● | ● *1 | ● *2 | ● | ● *4 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||
| Chip throw | ● | ● *3 | ● | ● *6 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||
A few hundredths of difference and one insert is doing the work of the whole set. The cheapest check with the biggest effect on tool life.
Offsetting it from the centre of the workpiece removes the impact on entry. It costs nothing and cuts breakouts by a factor of several.
Either copious and uninterrupted, or dry. A weak jet in milling is a direct route to a thermal comb.